Writing Boots

On communication, professional and otherwise.

Nothing to kill or die for. And no Santorum too.

03.13.2012 by David Murray // 4 Comments

Rereading President Obama's speech at the National Prayer Breakfast last month, I ran across an idea I'd like to dismiss:

"If we leave our values at the door," Obama said, "we abandon much of the moral glue that has held our nation together for centuries, and allowed us to become somewhat more perfect a union. Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, Jane Addams, Martin Luther King, Jr., Dorothy Day, Abraham Heschel—the majority of great reformers in American history did their work not just because it was sound policy, or they had done good analysis, or understood how to exercise good politics, but because their faith and their values dictated it, and called for bold action—sometimes in the face of indifference, sometimes in the face of resistance."

He's saying, in purposely uncertain terms, that when it comes to social good, Religious People Get More Done.

Now, Bill Maher and Christopher Hitchens have spent the last decade saying the opposite, that spiritually deranged religious people do much of the harm in the world, too. The atheists have a point, of course, and they've made it. And made it, and made it, and made it.

And I'm glad.

But mustn't a New York Times-reading, cocktail-snarfing, motorcycle-riding, golfing liberal agnostic writer like me acknowledge, if only in a parenthetical pause from my pontification, that when it comes to drawing a line and laying their life on it, religious people are more reliable than I?

For me—as for most of us, I suppose—Darfur bleeds into the Taliban's treatment of women who make me think about the lives of suicidal Chinese workers who made the computer from which I blog today's outrage (and schedule tomorrow's, a day ahead)?

I certainly don't want to go to0 far with this, but it does occur to me that a religious person might be more likely than a non-religous person to seize on a problem and commit a life to its solution. I honestly wonder whether Lincoln, Addams, King, Day and Heschel would have made their moves and maintained their movements without an explicit moral framework for justification and a church community for backup.

Douglass would have been fine without religion, because he was one bad-ass emmer effer. As were and will be any number of secular, non-religious American heroes.

But can't we all at least acknowledge that religion can be psychologically and socially useful as a provider of bright lines in a world of moral gray?

And if we can acknowledge it, shouldn't we do so, if only so that we may continue to claim to have more intellectual honesty than Rick Santorum, and to undercut his manipulative claims of cultural persecution?

I know Christians can probably never say out loud that atheists are good for the world. But sometimes you just have to be the bigger person.

Categories // Uncategorized Tags // Bill Maher, Christopher Hitchens, non-religious, President Obama, religious, Rick Santorum

There’ll be lots of drinking in heaven

12.16.2011 by David Murray // Leave a Comment

Last night in bed in Vanity Fair, I read Christopher Hitchens' typically astonishingly convincing contrarian  argument that Jackie Kennedy was only classy to the classless. "I am once again visited with that vague feeling that the lovely widow has actually rather lowered the tone," he said. And this morning I see that he, like she, is dead.

“Writing is what’s important to me, and anything that helps me do that—or enhances and prolongs and deepens and sometimes intensifies argument and conversation—is worth it to me,” Hitchens said after being diagnosed with throat cancer. He said he had no regrets because it was “impossible for me to imagine having my life without going to those parties, without having those late nights, without that second bottle.”

And though he was quite clear about not believing in heaven, I will allow myself to hope.

Categories // Uncategorized Tags // Christopher Hitchens

I go to the graveyard, where we all must go

08.18.2010 by David Murray // 1 Comment

It looks like the writer Christopher Hitchens is dying, and whether you like him or not—my feelings about him have vacillated horribly over the years, and I listen to him still with my head cocked hard—his last journey promises to be the most public and articulate one I can remember.

Notwithstanding our preference to talk about sex, let's get something out of this conversation about death, shall we?

Categories // Uncategorized Tags // cancer, Charlie Rose, Christopher Hitchens, drinking, dying, smoking

Now Available

An Effort to Understand

Order Now

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE BLOG UPDATES

About

David Murray writes on communication issues.
Read More

 

Categories

  • Baby Boots
  • Communication Philosophy
  • Efforts to Understand
  • Happy Men, and Other Eccentrics
  • Human Politicians
  • Mister Boring
  • Murray Cycle Diaries
  • Old Boots
  • Rambling, At Home and Abroad
  • Sports Stories
  • The Quotable Murr
  • Typewriter Truths
  • Uncategorized
  • Weird Scenes Inside the Archives

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Log in

  • Preorder An Effort to Understand
  • Sign Up for Blog Updates
  • About David Murray