Writing Boots

On communication, professional and otherwise.

An honest question for my conservative friends

08.04.2020 by David Murray // 1 Comment

A lot of white friends—mostly conservative, and mostly men—are finally clearing their throats and finding their voice, now a couple months after George Floyd. With increasing frequency, they are writing social media posts decrying “cancel culture,” and comparing “woke-ism” to McCarthyism.

As a white friend myself, I don’t have a hard time seeing the world from their point of view. But as a communicator, I am struggling to figure out what they think they’re trying to achieve, or who they think they’re talking to.

A conservative friend of mine posted a quote from a Wall Street Journal column complaining that what’s happening with the protests is “about more than statues and history. Those who control the symbols of political discourse can dominate the culture and control the collective consciousness.”

Well, yes—that’s why traditional historical narratives and the statues they celebrate are being challenged, Thurston! Because you have been dominating the culture and controlling the collective consciousness for a very long time, and others are demanding a turn.

There are legitimate questions about the current moment and mood, of course—about the social sustainability of cancel culture, the wisdom of woke-ism and the viability of a society that attempts to hold everyone‘s truth to be self-evident. Can the center hold in a vastly multicultural civilization that can’t agree a central founding myth or the shape of its historical narrative? Or can that civilization somehow come together and form a new shared story to bind it together as a nation?

This phrase “a more perfect union,” that we’re always hearing—that always sounds like tinkering, at a moment when it seems we might need an engine rebuild. But if you’re American, you’re supposed to be up for big experiments. You’re supposed to be up for the American experiment.

This is part of that.

And general griping about “woke-ism” and protester vandalism and cancel culture—excessive and simplistic and reckless as these phenomena may sometimes be—reminds me a little of a story Evel Knievel used to tell, about his “great great great great great great great great great grandfather,” who was dragged out into the middle of the Roman Colosseum and buried up to his neck. When Caesar arrived and took his seat, a lion was released. The lion charged at the senior Knievel, but before he could maul him, Knievel turned up his head and bit the lion’s balls off.

As the dentally neutered cat whimpered away, over the roaring crowd Caesar was heard to yell, “Fight fair, Knievel!”

Whether you agree with them or not, you the cancel-culturists and the woke-ists—from #metoo to BLM—firmly feel they’ve been buried up to their neck all these many years. And they will not sympathize with your apparent belief that they are actually Caesar and you are the man in the dirt.

You must understand that.

So—honest question—who are you trying to reach with these sorts of posts, and what are you trying to achieve?

Categories // Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Hal Gordon says

    August 5, 2020 at 12:39 am

    David: An honest question deserves an honest answer, although a full answer will take a lot more space than I have here. To put it briefly: the 1619 Project says that one of the reasons why we declared out independence from Britain is because we were afraid that the British would abolish slavery. That is untrue. It is demonstrably untrue, as eminent historians have documented. It is a LIE. It is one LIE among many LIES contained in the 1619 Project, which is now being circulated throughout thousands of schools in this country to brainwash our children and to make them subservient to the woke culture. Are you saying that we should accept lies as facts, because “it’s somebody else’s turn to control the historical narrative?” Sorry, I can’t accept that. Who am I trying to reach with these posts? Any Americans who can still think for themselves. What am I trying to achieve? Truth. I take your point about the need for a shared national narrative, but I think it has to be based on truth. If you want to know what I mean by that, see my blog post of July 8 on how to resolve the controversy over the Lincoln Emancipation Memorial. It’s on my web site, http://www.ringingwords.com, and it’s called “Tell the Whole Truth.” It represents one effort to create a shared national narrative: one that tries to do justice to everyone and one that is faithful to the truth.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Hal Gordon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Now Available

An Effort to Understand

Order Now

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE BLOG UPDATES

About

David Murray writes on communication issues.
Read More

 

Categories

  • Baby Boots
  • Communication Philosophy
  • Efforts to Understand
  • Happy Men, and Other Eccentrics
  • Human Politicians
  • Mister Boring
  • Murray Cycle Diaries
  • Old Boots
  • Rambling, At Home and Abroad
  • Sports Stories
  • The Quotable Murr
  • Typewriter Truths
  • Uncategorized
  • Weird Scenes Inside the Archives

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Log in

  • Preorder An Effort to Understand
  • Sign Up for Blog Updates
  • About David Murray