Writing Boots

On communication, professional and otherwise.

Self-conscious, or semi-conscious?

12.15.2009 by David Murray // 7 Comments

Sunday an off-duty Chicago fireman saw a high rise on fire, put down the hot dog he was eating, ran up 28 flights of stairs and rescued a woman lying in the fetal position in a smoky hallway. Afterward, he told reporters that anybody in his profession would do it, after apologizing in advance, "It sounds cliché."

Since when have fireman staggered, soot-covered, out of burning buildings apologizing for being so cliché.

I'd say, since right around the time ESPN started replaying games and calling them "Instant Classics." Why can't it just be a "that great game yesterday"?

And in this self-conscious, prepackaged environment, it makes perfect sense for a company with made-up corporate name (Accenturate the positive!) to announce—in the disembodied third person—that its chief spokesman "is no longer the right representative for its advertising."

Wait. Doesn't everybody who consumes that announcement already know full well that a professional golfer was never the right representative of a business consultancy, any more than a TV actor has any actual credibility on the subject of how to invest our money.

And yet, when Accenture dumped Tiger Woods, we all nodded solemnly and intoned: They had to do it. He just doesn't have any credibility anymore.

Suddenly, we have decided, because he is a skirt-chaser, the golf pro doesn't have any credibility to tell us what consultancy to hire.

These days, we're the suckers and the hucksters both.

It's a hell of a lot of work, and it doesn't pay well.

Categories // Uncategorized Tags // "instant classics", Accenture, Chicago fireman, cliche, ESPN, high-rise fire, hucksters, suckers, Tiger Woods

Comments

  1. Seth Godin says

    December 15, 2009 at 6:52 am

    I think the reason Tiger was an effective pitchman had very little to do with his golf skills and a lot to do with the juxtaposition of his high visibility combined with his self-proclaimed self-discipline. Lee Trevino was never as good at golf as Jack, but he was a great spokesman (because he was funny and approachable)…
    So, in the case of Tiger, a successful person who got there via self control and persistence makes a good spokesperson.
    I think it’s fair to say that his visibility today isn’t as valuable as it was, and his positioning has been undermined by current events. So, both pillars go away.
    You can make money from cliches, but when the cliches stop being ‘true’, expect not to make money from them, no?

    Reply
  2. David Murray says

    December 15, 2009 at 7:55 am

    Seth, no doubt Woods is not the proposition he was two weeks ago, nothing like it.
    But what baloney we willingly buy from these spokespeople. It was one thing when Ronny Reagan was selling Chesterfield cigarettes; he was as big an authority as anybody.
    But there’s something hilariously absurd about a public buying business consulting from Tiger Woods or investment advice from Sam Waterston–and then suavely pursing its lips and declaring that the golfer or actor aren’t “credible” anymore.
    My point is, THEY WERE NEVER CREDIBLE. We were, quite willingly, credulous.

    Reply
  3. Mike Klein says

    December 15, 2009 at 8:51 am

    What corporation doesn’t have a made up name? Are corporate names supposed to be hand picked from corporate name trees in Florida, or strip mined in the great corporate name deposits of the Kalahari desert?

    Reply
  4. David Murray says

    December 15, 2009 at 9:12 am

    Mike, how about real things:
    International Business Machines.
    Or real people:
    Ford.
    Or real concepts:
    The Container Store.

    Reply
  5. Ron Shewchuk says

    December 15, 2009 at 9:34 am

    Or real fruits: Apple.

    Reply
  6. Diane says

    December 15, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    International Harvester. Oh, wait, I mean “Navistar.”
    BTW, I play a doctor on TV.

    Reply
  7. David Murray says

    December 15, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    Diane, thanks for two references I wish I’da laid tongue to.
    (Esp. International Harvester vs. Navistar. Gee, let’s trade in the most evocative name in corporate America for the least … and call it BRANDING!)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Now Available

An Effort to Understand

Order Now

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE BLOG UPDATES

About

David Murray writes on communication issues.
Read More

 

Categories

  • Baby Boots
  • Communication Philosophy
  • Efforts to Understand
  • Happy Men, and Other Eccentrics
  • Human Politicians
  • Mister Boring
  • Murray Cycle Diaries
  • Old Boots
  • Rambling, At Home and Abroad
  • Sports Stories
  • The Quotable Murr
  • Typewriter Truths
  • Uncategorized
  • Weird Scenes Inside the Archives

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Log in

  • Preorder An Effort to Understand
  • Sign Up for Blog Updates
  • About David Murray