In meetings and conference calls with corporate communication folks, I'm hearing a term in the last year or two that I don't remember hearing before: "pause."
As in, "We put the Employee Engagement Measurement program on pause. We'll revisit it after the merger goes through."
Until recently, the only thing to do with a program, initiative, negotiation whose relevance was decreasing was to:
cancel it
mothball it
put it on the back burner
forget it was ever a thing and never speak of it again
Now, you can pause it.
I think that's sane, because though it may well mean the same as cancel, mothball, back-burner and forget-about-it—it doesn't necessarily have to.
The program was a good idea at the time, and it may have even seemed like an urgent idea at the time. And (like wide lapels or skinny ties), it may be a good and urgent idea again. But right now other ideas take precedence. So the idea is on pause.
Often, jargon hides a homely reality behind a sheen of world class excellence.
In the case of "pause," I think jargon acknowledges the reality that good ideas shouldn't be shamed into oblivion just because something else has come up, or something shinier has temporarily blinded us.
Do you agree?
Leave a Reply